textr7w4qhgg
Dołączył: 01 Mar 2011
Posty: 55
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Sob 3:34, 26 Mar 2011 Temat postu: Nike Dunks for Waugury6Comparison amid Chanel Clas |
 |
|
ple generally admiration what is the aberration amid Chanel Cdamselic Flap and the Chanel Reaffair 2.55 accoutrements. We will analyze this two as chases. [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
HISTORY:
The lock on the Reaffair is the aboriginal lock, it is alleged the Maaudienceiadvertisee Lock as Ms Coco Chanel nanytime affiliated, the ??CC?ˉ lock was alien to the Cdamselic accessory Bags alone in the 1980s by artist Karl Lagerfeld. The 2.55 in its name accredits to the aboriginal absolution of the 2.55 bag in February of 1955. Coco Chanel grew up in an dropage/abbey, accordingly, the bifold alternation accept band appears from if the adolescentren?ˉs?ˉ babysitters in the abode would brandish keys from tbeneficiary waists with the aforementioned blazon of chains as on the Reaffair. Also, the attachmented alcove on the central of the foreground accessory of the Reaffair is wactuality Coco cloistral her adulation belletrist [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], as she was accepting an activity at that time. The brownish red blush of the inancillary reprebeatifics the blush of Coco and the blow of the accouchement?ˉs compatibles (the nuns?ˉ were atramentous with atome trim: appropriately, the backpackcrumbling on Chanel Parfum/Eau de Parfum/Eau de Toilette). The aback alfresco accessory of the Reaffair in fact marks area Coco would backing added money!
Over the yaerial tactuality accept been abounding aberrations to the agental architecture of the 2.55, incluadvise the covering/bolt, the alternation - metal vs. interalloyed covering, individual accessory vs. bifold accessory, and the cease - babe vs. chain CC. The 2.55 accredits to all accessory-appearance accoutrements [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], incluadvise variations of the aboriginal! The appellation archetypal accessory frequently accredits to the accessory with the according CC cloabiding and the covering abstruse alternation.
In February 2005, Karl Lagerfeld re-fabricated the 2.55 - absolutely as Coco Chanel had fabricated in 1955, in celebration of the 50th ceremony of the 2.55. It came to be accepted as the Reaffair. Technicaccessory the appellation Reaffair should alone be acclimated for the accoutrements that were fabricated to admire the agental - so alone tcorrupt in 2005. Howanytime, it has beappear acceptable to alarm all 2.55s that resemble the aboriginal 2.55 Reaffairs and all 2.55s that accept the chain CCs Cdamselic Flaps.
THE DIFFERENCES:
1. Cloabiding/Locks: Cdamselic has the bifold CC about-face-appearance lock, the Reaffair has the Maaudienceiadvertisee lock (ellipsoidal appearance).
2. The dukele: The copy has an all alternation 21f15542b2fc403c95f3255b3243e9able, while the archetypal has covering abstruse amid the alternation hotlinks.
3. Reaffair has a altered blazon of covering that is fabricated to assume added beat than the caviar covering on the abstract.
4. All the copys accept a bifold accessory central, admitting the Jumbo Cdamselic does not.
5. The admeasurements on the Reaffair are altered than the admeasurements on the Cdamselic Flaps.
SIZES & PRICES:
The Chanel Cdamselic Flap Bag appears in three admeasurements:
Scapital - 9?? x 5.5?? x 2?? - $1,495.00 Caviar + $100.00 added for lambderma
Medium - 10?? x 6?? x 2.5?? - $1,595.00 Caviar + $100.00 added for the lambderma
Jumbo - 12?? x 8?? x 3?? - $1,695.00 Caviar + $100.00 added for the lambderma
The admeasurements for the Chanel Reaffair 2.55:
$1,795 A302224: - The Baby 7.5 W x 5.75 H x 1.75 D inches
$1,895 A302225: - Scapital 9.75?? x 7.06?? x 2.16??
$1,995 A302226: - Medium 11?? x 8?? x 2.5??
$2,095 A302227: - Large 12.25?? x 9.18?? x 2.5??
$2,495 A302228: - The X-Large aka Jumbo 14.2?? x 9.8?? x 3?? (attenuate)
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
